The age-old question

"How come if a woman does it, she's a slut, but if a man does it, he's a stud?"

Recently, there was a minor stink about some photos that have been going around the Internet concerning a University of Western Ontario student doing a striptease act. Underlying a lot of the commentary is some concern about how a young lady in a place of higher learning could engage in such demeaning behaviour.

Some have suggested that this type of "slut feminism" is simply women exercising their right to be sexually aggressive if they so choose. Others call this the phenomenon of "female chauvinist pigs" and look to the faux lesbianism and boob-baring antics of the "Girls Gone Wild" series.

From where I stand - and I'm just one guy speaking here - I think that this is great if you're a horny college student on spring break, but it is not the type of behaviour that we fellas like to see in a woman who we'd consider a keeper. The double standard exists for a reason, and it's this: Men are programmed biologically to ejaculate. We need it. It is in our very being to spread our seed with as many women as possible. Women, on the other hand, are biologically programmed to compliment, not imitate, this trait. Despite what radical feminist orthodoxy has tried to convince society, women naturally eschew those kinds of sexually animalistic tendencies that we men have in favour of finding a male provider and protector. In other words, women are programmed biologically to temper and moderate our more impulsive and irresponsible sexual urges. This is not to say that a gal shouldn't go for a good ol' one-nighter once in a while, if she feels the need. However, no guy in his right mind wants a gal who acts like a frat boy. Nobody wants a slut, and if a gal is classy, desirable and embraces her femininity, she won't have to worry about the double standard because she won't be the one asking the question.