Tuesday digest
- According to an Ontario Superior Court judge, the right to plot mass murder of innocent civilians in the name of political, religious or ideological grievance is guaranteed by the Canadian Constitution.
I don't think the FLQ-busting Pierre Trudeau had that freedom in mind when he conceived the Charter.
- Today's loony left play of the day comes from NDP MP Dawn Black, who, in arguing for higher standards of decorum in Parliament, typically went way too far and undermined her own credibility by uttering the following:
"There's a basic disdain of women in politics, still, by many members," said Black. "When women get up to speak there's a look of anger in the faces of many men in the House of Commons."
She can't be serious.
A look of ... anger?!?
More here.
- As Gilles Duceppe promotes his fantasy of achieving a seperate Quebec in less than ten years, Brigitte Pellerin points out how refusing to recognize the power of incentives is what has castigated Sweden on the St. Lawrence to third-class status economically. On that note, this article is highly critical of central planners left and right.
- A look from Down Under at the limits of multiculturalism, here. The question for me is this: at what point should freedom of religion take a back seat to assimilation? For me, the answer is somewhere between the veil and genital multilation.
- North America bailing Europe out again? Hey, why not? It's a great idea, on paper, anyways, but no European government would want to play ball with this White House on trade unless they had a death wish politically. I could see steps being taken towards a US/EU free trade agreement under either McCain or Hilary, though, especially if the (wrongheaded) protectionist crowd led by Lou Dobbs quiets down.
8 Comments:
Hammer, I'm curious to hear your take on Bush acknowledging a parallel between the Vietnam War and Iraq several days back on ABC news.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hey Greenchief,
Not having been alive during the bulk of the Vietnam War, I'm vastly underqualified to offer any comment on that.
On second thought, allow me to offer the obvious parallel that in both instances, significant numbers of Americans are or were rooting for their own country to lose a war.
JW, no offense as I don't even know who you are, but guy, you need to lighten that chip on your shoulder.
Yah it's all sounding more and more Marc Lepine-ish by the day.
Get some counseling JW. Whatever that broad did to you, it ain't worth taking an AK-47 into a classroom.
Hammer, sorry to drag out an old debate, but haven't had a chance to respond ...
I bring up Bush's Nam' comments becasue I recall you saying that absolutely no one should ever draw a parallel between the two conflicts. You seemed pretty strong in your opinions at that time.
Now Gerogie boy has admitted parallels, and you're playing the "I'm not qualified to comment card?"
But for all of W's shortcomings, I do have to give him begrudging credit for finally making a few concessions on the situation in Iraq.
It was the journalist who made the comparison and asked W to comment, right?
At the time (which I recall was about a year and a half ago if I'm not mistaken) I said parallels couldn't be made. Now, perhaps a different story.
I'm finishing off a massive Harry Truman bio right now and during my obligatory review I'll address these kinds of questions while offering my regular amateurish and sophomoric take on things. Stay tuned.
Post a Comment
<< Home